In this case regarding the Child Abuse Registry, the Supreme Court of Georgia remanded to the superior court with direction to dismiss and explained that (1) the superior court erred by addressing the constitutionality of the Child Abuse Registry statutes and rules when the plaintiffs (appellees) were required to exhaust the administrative process ; (2) […]
The Supreme Court of Georgia considered claims regarding the Child Protective Services Information System (the Act) and determined that (1) the child sex abuse offender whose name was added to the Child Abuse Registry failed to show the deprivation of a liberty or property interest based on injury to his reputation and impact on future
In this matter regarding a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit, the Court of Appeals vacated the order of the superior court to the extent that it affirmed the issuance of the permit, and it remanded with direction that the superior court in turn remand the case to the ALJ for reconsideration. The Court of
Although the District could have acted with more urgency, it did not violate the Child Find provisions of IDEA, which require it to identify and evaluate a child with a suspected disability within a reasonable amount of time.
No violation of Child Find Read More
IDEA does not require psychologist to attend IEP meetings to discuss psychoeducational evaluation results.
Psychologist not required at IEP meeting Read More
OSAH does not have jurisdiction to enforce a Resolution Agreement reached through the State Complaint process.
No jurisdiction to enforce resolution agreement Read More
