The Superior Court of Fulton County affirmed OSAH’s decision, which had been adopted by the Department’s agency reviewer, to place Petitioner, a licensed ambulance service provider, on probation and to fine it for providing ambulance services outside of its designated zone. The Superior Court also ruled that the statewide zoning scheme does not violate the […]
The Department of Community Health (DCH) correctly determined that Petitioner does not meet the minimal requirements to qualify for intermediate nursing home level of care under the Service Options Using Resources in Community Environments Program (SOURCE). In order to meet the level of care necessary to qualify for SOURCE, the individual must meet the qualifications
Petitioner, a classified employee, was appropriately suspended without pay for one week due to her failure to report to work, her consistent lateness to monthly meetings, and her poor adherence to communication policies. In addition, Petitioner’s employment history and failure to improve even after corrective training justified the suspension. Although routinely utilized, the use of
The Professional Standards Commission (PSC) issued Petitioner a teaching certificate, while also reprimanding him. The reprimand was the result of Petitioner’s 2008 guilty plea to eight counts of felony Financial Transaction Card Fraud under the First Offender Act. Although Petitioner successfully completed his period of probation and submitted letters of recommendation, neither negated his criminal
Criminal activity resulted in reprimand of teaching certificate. Read More
The Division of Child Support Services (CSS) may suspend Petitioner’s licenses, including his state-issued driver’s license, for failure to pay child support. Petitioner has not voluntarily paid child support since 2009, and his arrearage as of October 31, 2013, was $12,122.84. Petitioner cannot claim an exemption from suspension because he has not been active in
Failure to pay child support justifies suspension of licenses. Read More
Plaintiff, a child receiving special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), was not denied a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment. Plaintiff, who has been diagnosed with Down’s syndrome, has an Individualized Education Program (IEP) that provides for her unique needs. First, the IEP is
