admin

Reduction of food stamps proper where no evidence that Petitioner was personally liable for medical expenses.

The Division of Family and Children Services properly calculated Petitioner’s food stamp benefits.  Petitioner was not entitled to an excess medical deduction because she did not produce evidence that she was personally liable to pay medical bills.

Reduction of food stamps proper where no evidence that Petitioner was personally liable for medical expenses. Read More

Food stamp application denied where applicant’s income exceeded gross income limit.

Petitioner was correctly denied Food Stamp assistance because his combined earned and unearned income together exceeded the total maximum gross monthly income limit for a household unit of one. Petitioner argued that the Division of Family and Children Services  should have used his earned income from May 2013 instead of June 2013; however, this was

Food stamp application denied where applicant’s income exceeded gross income limit. Read More

Medicaid recipient was properly placed in the Pharmacy Lock-In Program to eliminate prescription abuse.

Petitioner, a Medicaid recipient, was placed in Department of Community Health’s Pharmacy Lock-In Program after discovering a pattern of behavior indicating prescription abuse.  First, Petitioner’s drug therapy did not correlate with his diagnoses.  Second, his provider triggered the investigation upon suspicions of prescription drug abuse. Third, more than 10% of his filled prescriptions were for

Medicaid recipient was properly placed in the Pharmacy Lock-In Program to eliminate prescription abuse. Read More

Emergency closure upheld on basis of blatant disregard of licensing requirements and endangerment of children.

Petitioner, who runs a group day care and child care learning center, was subject to an order for emergency closure for twenty-one days on the basis of (1) Petitioner’s blatant disregard of applicable licensing requirements; (2) Petitioner’s actions and inactions, which placed the safety and welfare of the children in her care in imminent danger;

Emergency closure upheld on basis of blatant disregard of licensing requirements and endangerment of children. Read More

Scroll to Top