In this matter, the Court reversed the suspension of a driver’s license on the grounds that the driver was not timely informed of her implied consent rights. Despite four officers being present at the arrest, the driver did not have the implied consent notice read to her until at least one hour and 22 minutes […]
The Department of Community Health sought to recoup $14,040.00 paid to a healthcare provider for services it delivered through Medicaid. The Court affirmed the Department’s decision, finding that the provider did not have sufficient patient-treatment records that would justify the billed Medicaid costs. Although the provider argued the COVID-19 pandemic prevented it from obtaining the
Lack of patient records leads to $14,040 Medicaid recoupment from healthcare provider Read More
In this case, a woman had been receiving benefits under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, commonly referred to as TANF. Her benefits were later terminated because she had failed to meet the agency’s stated deadline for submitting verification documents to support her renewal application. The evidence presented at the hearing showed she missed
TANF law does not require a specific deadline for parties to submit verification forms Read More
This case involved a decision by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to deny an advertising company a permit to construct a multi-message sign. The Court concluded the permit had been properly denied, as the proposed sign would have been within 5,000 feet of another multi-message sign. The company argued that the other sign’s permit
A company had appealed the Georgia Department of Economic Development’s denial of its application for a tax credit. Upon its referral to this Court, the case was immediately scheduled for a hearing. For the next 18 months, the parties submitted repeated requests to postpone the hearing, on the grounds that they were engaging in settlement
Case remanded to agency following multiple requests from parties to delay hearing Read More
In this case brought under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the Court concluded that for a period of about seven months, the school district failed to develop an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) that was reasonably calculated for a teenage student diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder to make reasonable progress toward his communication goals.
Student with autism did not receive FAPE during COVID-related virtual learning Read More
