Respondent erected a sign visible from and adjacent to State Route 515. Respondent applied for the necessary permit, but the Department denied the permit because the sign is in a residential area. The Court ordered the Respondent to remove the sign within 120 days and authorized the Department to remove the sign if Respondent failed […]
Petitioner is licensed by Respondent to operate a childcare learning center. During a site visit, Respondent discovered that Petitioner had not recorded the necessary second check of one of the vehicles after it was used to transport children, and commenced disciplinary action. One week before the hearing on Petitioner’s appeal, Petitioner provided a document purportedly
The Professional Standards Commission sought to suspend Petitioner’s teaching certificate for one year. Petitioner, who was a chaperone at the school prom, consumed alcohol prior to arriving at the school prom and again at the bar in the hotel where the prom was being held after his shift as chaperone had ended. The Commission’s proposed
Petitioner was caught cheating during the examination component of a Resident Agent License Application. She failed the exam, but the company administering the exam reported the incident to the Georgia Department of Insurance (“DOI”). After Petitioner took the exam again and passed, the DOI refused to grant her a license. The DOI properly exercised it
A school district was directed to pay for a student’s continued placement in a private facility after the student could not complete the three-part transition period, which was designed to prepare the student to move back to the school district. As the transition period was an integral part of the student’s Individualized Education Plan (IEP),
Although a School District violated procedural safeguards under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) by providing services different from those specified in Petitioner’s Individualized Education Program (IEP), Petitioner was not entitled to relief inasmuch as Petitioner could not show that the changes actually caused a deprivation of educational benefits. While the School District
